<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updating Ghostscript on CentOS 5.2 (ghostscript 8.63)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/</link>
	<description>personal musings on the composition of software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Updating Ghostscript on CentOS 5.4 (ghostscript 8.70) (the remix) &#124; Chris Schuld's Blog</title>
		<link>http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator>Updating Ghostscript on CentOS 5.4 (ghostscript 8.70) (the remix) &#124; Chris Schuld's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 06:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisschuld.com/?p=145#comment-1398</guid>
		<description>[...] while back I wrote an article on updating to ghostscript 8.63 on CentOS 5.2. I received a fair amount of email and comments on the topic ranging from &#8220;thanks&#8221; to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while back I wrote an article on updating to ghostscript 8.63 on CentOS 5.2. I received a fair amount of email and comments on the topic ranging from &#8220;thanks&#8221; to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus</title>
		<link>http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisschuld.com/?p=145#comment-947</guid>
		<description>No need to remove ghostscript first. 

I just grabbed all the rpm&#039;s (thanks Chris) using wget.  

put all the packages as args to rpm and it will handle the upgrade.

rpm -Uvh ghostscript-8.63-1.i386.rpm centos52/ghostscript-devel-8.63-1.i386.rpm ghostscript-gtk-8.63-1.i386.rpm

I presume you could skip the wget process and just give rpm a list of the http&#039;s resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No need to remove ghostscript first. </p>
<p>I just grabbed all the rpm&#8217;s (thanks Chris) using wget.  </p>
<p>put all the packages as args to rpm and it will handle the upgrade.</p>
<p>rpm -Uvh ghostscript-8.63-1.i386.rpm centos52/ghostscript-devel-8.63-1.i386.rpm ghostscript-gtk-8.63-1.i386.rpm</p>
<p>I presume you could skip the wget process and just give rpm a list of the http&#8217;s resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisschuld.com/?p=145#comment-690</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info and for hosting the files making installation a snap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info and for hosting the files making installation a snap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisschuld.com/?p=145#comment-673</guid>
		<description>You Rocks man ;)
Thanks for sharing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Rocks man <img src='http://chrisschuld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Thanks for sharing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tian</title>
		<link>http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Tian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisschuld.com/?p=145#comment-664</guid>
		<description>Very useful. I just wonder why not replace the old 8.15 version with the newest one in CentOS 5.2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful. I just wonder why not replace the old 8.15 version with the newest one in CentOS 5.2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisschuld.com/?p=145#comment-655</guid>
		<description>Interesting, I&#039;m in the same position.  We have seen that 8.15 has issues with newer PDFs.  I&#039;ve run into a problem with your RPMs.  I get complains on the ghostscript-fonts dependency:

error: Failed dependencies:
	ghostscript-fonts is needed by ghostscript-8.63-1.i386

The older 8.15 ghostscript-fonts from the repo doesn&#039;t satisfy the dependency.  I&#039;m curious to know how you were able to install without fonts?

Would you mind posting your spec files for your RPMs?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I&#8217;m in the same position.  We have seen that 8.15 has issues with newer PDFs.  I&#8217;ve run into a problem with your RPMs.  I get complains on the ghostscript-fonts dependency:</p>
<p>error: Failed dependencies:<br />
	ghostscript-fonts is needed by ghostscript-8.63-1.i386</p>
<p>The older 8.15 ghostscript-fonts from the repo doesn&#8217;t satisfy the dependency.  I&#8217;m curious to know how you were able to install without fonts?</p>
<p>Would you mind posting your spec files for your RPMs?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjamin Indermühle</title>
		<link>http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>benjamin Indermühle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisschuld.com/?p=145#comment-585</guid>
		<description>It would be nice to have source rpms or at least the specfiles of your rpms.
No offense but I have an issue with just using binaries from a source which I dont trust. 
Thanks Alot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to have source rpms or at least the specfiles of your rpms.<br />
No offense but I have an issue with just using binaries from a source which I dont trust.<br />
Thanks Alot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ljubomir</title>
		<link>http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ljubomir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisschuld.com/?p=145#comment-579</guid>
		<description>First, thanks for compiling this, I saved considerable time.

Jasper is available via EPEL project repositories http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL, along with lot of other stuff.

You might consider contributing ghostscript packages via their repository, it would be much easier for all CentOS community.

Also, I have seen new 8.64 version is out, with some 100 bugs fixed and some improvements: http://www.ghostscript.com/GPL_Ghostscript_8.64.html. I hope you have some time to build that versions rpm&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, thanks for compiling this, I saved considerable time.</p>
<p>Jasper is available via EPEL project repositories <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL" rel="nofollow">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL</a>, along with lot of other stuff.</p>
<p>You might consider contributing ghostscript packages via their repository, it would be much easier for all CentOS community.</p>
<p>Also, I have seen new 8.64 version is out, with some 100 bugs fixed and some improvements: <a href="http://www.ghostscript.com/GPL_Ghostscript_8.64.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ghostscript.com/GPL_Ghostscript_8.64.html</a>. I hope you have some time to build that versions rpm&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisschuld.com/?p=145#comment-568</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

is there a possibility to get the x86_64 version of your ghostscript version? I tried to build for myself, but it failed everytime.

Thanks.

Marcus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>is there a possibility to get the x86_64 version of your ghostscript version? I tried to build for myself, but it failed everytime.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Marcus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenzo</title>
		<link>http://chrisschuld.com/2008/11/updating-ghostscript-on-centos-52-ghostscript-863/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorenzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisschuld.com/?p=145#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Solved.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solved.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
